The $150,000 Tax Cut Proposal: Will It Save You Money or Wreck the Economy?

Introduction

Imagine waking up to the news that your federal income taxes have been eliminated. No more paycheck deductions, no April 15th tax deadline—just untaxed earnings. Sounds like a dream, right?

This is the premise behind the $150,000 tax cut proposal—a plan to waive federal income taxes for individuals earning under $150,000. At first glance, this sounds like a major win for middle-class and lower-income earners. But as with any tax policy, the details matter.

• Is this tax cut financially viable?

• How will the government replace the lost tax revenue?

• Does this truly mean “no taxes,” or are there hidden deductions still in play?

This article breaks down the numbers, fiscal implications, and overlooked factors—including payroll taxes—to uncover what this proposal really means for taxpayers and the economy.

Breaking Down the Numbers: Who Pays What?

To evaluate the feasibility of the $150,000 tax cut, we need to examine who currently pays federal income tax and how much revenue is at stake.

How Much Do Taxpayers Under $150,000 Contribute?

The IRS Statistics of Income (SOI) Reports provide a breakdown of federal income tax contributions by income bracket. Based on 2022 data:

• The total federal income tax revenue in 2022 was approximately $2.05 trillion.

• Taxpayers earning under $150,000 contributed around $370 billion in total federal income taxes.

• Lower-income individuals (under $30,000) often have net-negative tax liability due to tax credits like the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) and Child Tax Credit (CTC).

Would Eliminating This Tax Be Feasible?

If this $370 billion in lost revenue is not replaced, the federal government would face a massive budget shortfall. This raises a crucial question: How will the government make up for this revenue loss?

The Feasibility of Eliminating $370 Billion in Tax Revenue

Can Spending Cuts Offset the Loss?

One argument for the $150,000 tax cut is that it could be offset by government spending reductions. The administration claims to have saved taxpayers $200 billion through discretionary spending cuts (often referred to as DOGE). However, the reality is more complex:

• Government spending is controlled by Congress, and recent appropriations maintain spending at current levels.

• If spending cuts aren’t enforced, the tax cut would increase the federal deficit rather than offsetting lost revenue.

• Even if we assume $400 billion in spending reductions, this plan does not reduce the national debt—it simply shifts how the government funds itself.

Would This Plan Increase the National Deficit?

The federal deficit is already a major concern. Reducing tax revenue without equal spending cuts means the government must borrow more money, worsening the national debt crisis.

✅ Eliminating federal income taxes under $150,000 is possible—if offset by spending cuts.
❌ If spending cuts don’t happen, the plan will drive up the national deficit, leading to higher debt and potential economic instability.

The Overlooked Payroll Tax Issue

Even if federal income tax were eliminated, most workers still wouldn’t take home their full paycheck due to payroll taxes—which fund Social Security and Medicare.

What Are Payroll Taxes?

Unlike income tax, payroll taxes are mandatory contributions that directly fund Social Security and Medicare. Here's how they break down:

• Social Security Tax – 12.4% total (split 6.2% employer / 6.2% employee)

• Medicare Tax – 2.9% total (split 1.45% employer / 1.45% employee)

• Additional Medicare Tax – 0.9% for individuals earning over $200,000

Why Payroll Taxes Are a Bigger Concern

The biggest issue? Social Security is already facing insolvency.

• Social Security is currently running a deficit—it pays out more than it collects in taxes.

• The Social Security trust fund is projected to be depleted within the next decade.

• If payroll taxes were eliminated, Social Security and Medicare would collapse overnight.

The Key Misconception

Many people assume the $150,000 tax cut means they will take home their entire paycheck—but this is false. Workers would still pay payroll taxes, which significantly impact their overall tax burden.

✅ This proposal eliminates federal income tax for earners under $150,000.
❌ It does NOT eliminate payroll taxes (Social Security & Medicare).
❌ It does NOT solve long-term fiscal challenges like Social Security insolvency.

Misconceptions About "Tax-Free" Income

While this tax plan sounds attractive, it is not a true “tax-free” policy. Let’s clarify what this proposal actually means:

✅ What this tax cut does:

• Reduces federal income tax liability to $0 for individuals earning under $150,000.

❌ What this tax cut does NOT do:

• Does not eliminate payroll taxes (Social Security & Medicare deductions still apply).

• Does not address corporate tax loopholes or tax avoidance by billionaires.

• Does not reduce the deficit unless paired with spending cuts.

How Much More Would People Actually Take Home?

Even if the $150,000 tax cut were implemented, most workers would still have 15.3% of their wages deducted for payroll taxes. This means:

• A worker earning $50,000 per year would still see $7,650 withheld for payroll taxes.

• A worker earning $100,000 per year would still pay $15,300 in payroll taxes.

So while this proposal would increase take-home pay, the gains would be less dramatic than many people assume.

Conclusion: What Comes Next?

The $150,000 tax cut proposal is an intriguing concept, but it comes with major trade-offs.

✅ Yes, it could be budget-neutral—if paired with equivalent spending cuts.
❌ No, it does NOT mean workers will take home their full paycheck—payroll taxes still apply.
❌ No, it does NOT reduce the deficit unless spending is also reduced.

The Bigger Picture: Is Tax Reform Needed?

If policymakers are serious about tax reform, they need to look beyond big promises and address:

• How taxes are structured

• Who actually pays them

• What reforms are sustainable long-term

Otherwise, we risk replacing one financial problem with another.

What Do You Think?

Would you support the $150,000 tax cut, or do you believe a different approach is needed? Let’s discuss!

Appendix & Resources

For those interested in deeper analysis, here are some key sources:

• IRS SOI Reports (2022) – Source of tax revenue breakdowns.

• Congressional Budget Office (CBO) – Projections on Social Security solvency.

• Historical Data on Tax Cuts – Analysis of past tax reforms and their economic impact.

• Cumulative Tax Data Worksheet

This debate is just one piece of a larger discussion on taxation, government spending, and fiscal responsibility. Whatever your stance, one thing is clear: there’s no such thing as a free lunch—especially in tax policy.